Paper 4 Question 1



    Over the years English has increased in popularity and more countries are being obligated to learn English. Countries like China, Indonesia, and Sweden, it’s mandatory to learn English. As it’s grown in popularity the majority of its speakers speak it as a second language rather than it being s first language.

    Because of the popularity English has reached, many are thinking of making it the official global language. A global language is a language that’s so spread out across the world that everyone would know it. Setting it as the official global language could prevent any miscommunications when two countries speak to each other. This could be between the UK and China or China and France. The chances of someone that speaks only mandarin and someone that speaks only french meeting in the middle to speak english are way higher than they used to.

    According to the article “The World Economic Forum estimates about 1.5 billion people around the world speak it – but fewer than 400 million have it as their first language.” Thus proving English’s success in becoming the world’s favorite lingua franca. However it will take some time due to the idea of English becoming the official global language has become a more resent discussion.

    It first came up in 1997 but was first written down as an idea in 1995. To some it feels like a long time but compared to other plans that took more years to accomplish, 25 years isn't a lot. Plus, it wasn’t a big hit right away. It takes time for something to be considered so in reality it’s been less than 25 years of discussion. Furthermore, this is the whole world that has to talk about this. All the counties need a say if English is going to be a global language.

    Regardless of how close it seems to accomplish this accomplishment, the one thing that gets in the way of this becoming reality is the evolution of technology. As technology grows, they are coming up with ways where two people could talk in their native languages and still understand each other. AI has been evolving to translate for people over call, text, and more. No more use for human translators or learning english.

    But at the same time it’s because of technology and the internet that is spreading English. Popular social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Tik Tok, and YouTube are merging the different languages into one circle to interact. On some of these, they already have a translation button for viewers of a different language to understand what a comment was or the description of the video or picture.


    Social media isn’t the only place that has that ability. In the article it says “But with a couple of clicks on your computer, or taps on your tablet, you could just as easily be reading it in German or Japanese.“ From this, it can be inferred that there are programs on computers that can do the same translation magic.


    There are two main problems when it comes to technology. One the ability to hack into the system. Two, the accuracy of the translations.


    The ability to hack into these programs to translate words in real time can cause a lot of problems regarding communication. Meaning the words said could easily not match up with the words heard. This can cause a dispute between the two and cause lots of miscommunications.


    As for the accuracy, that isn’t as big of an issue as the first since that can be modified with time. More programs are being more and more accurate when translating one language to another. But there should be a limit on how well it can be translated unless translating every single sentence.


    In the end, the idea of learning a common language between everyone should be talked about more. The outcome to learning a single language everyone understands has many benefits and can prevent the hacking and messing with words and then no one has to keep evolving the work on how well a translator works. Even though the technology works it would be good to learn English as well for plan B.

Comments

  1. -AO1: Your clearly understood the text, but in my opinion, you fluffed it more rather than connecting the English language to wider studies. This inclusion would have added more depth to your writing and made it stronger. Score: 6
    -AO2: Your blog was mostly on task, however slightly steered off-task when you mentioned how hacking can be a problem when it comes to technology. Also, your blog is not necessarily structured in the clearest way. You mentioned the present, then the past, then the present again. The futuristic connections tended to be weaker. Score: 4
    -AO4: Again, I think your blog properly evaluated English through the world by means of the given text, but the limited wider study limits your ability to extrapolate further predicts or evaluations regarding the English language in the future. However, I liked the way you mentioned various digital applications. Score: 6
    Final Score: 16/25

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Zoie,
    AO1: 7 marks
    You display a detailed understanding of the text by discussing the important topics that the article discusses and discuss the important issues raised in the text. You show a clear reference to specific points but some points seem a bit vague and need a bit more detail. There are a couple sentences that could use a word to be more official and to flow better. For example, at the start of your second paragraph, you write “many are thinking of making it the official global language.” This sentence seems a little vague on who is thinking of making English the official global language. In the future, make sure to reread what you are writing for your main points and make sure you are addressing them properly

    AO2: 2 marks
    Your expression throughout your blog is clear but it doesn’t flow that well. There are no errors that I notice but the paragraphs seem choppy and don’t flow well. As your writing goes on, the paragraphs seem to get shorter and to make it flow better, you should combine some of them, but make sure they aren’t really long either.

    AO4: 6 marks
    Throughout your blog, you display a clear understanding of linguistic issues, concepts and approaches used in the article. You also display a clear reference about the wider study of linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches but to score more marks, you need to go into a bit more detail overall.


    ReplyDelete
  3. AO1: 6/10 marks - You had a clear understanding of the text as well as clear reference to specific points. I think you could have added more detail to some points because they seemed very vague and not in depth.
    AO2: 2/5 marks - Content is mostly relevant, expression is clear but may not flow. I feel if you rearranged some paragraphs or connected concepts together it would flow better.
    AO4: 6/10 marks - You had a clear understanding of the linguistic issues and clear reference to wider studies. But I feel as though you could have had more references of wider studies to strengthen your writing.

    Overall Mark: 14/25 marks

    ReplyDelete
  4. AO1: You displayed a clear understanding of text within your blog, in reference to the context, meaning, and audience. However, I often felt as though you just provided a recap of the actual article rather than going in-depth. There was a clear reference to specific points throughout. I gave this 5 marks.
    AO2: There was a clear expression, with occasional errors which did not impede communication. The content provided was relevant, and the ideas were developed clearly. However, I found several of your quotes to be very long when they could’ve easily been summarized for quicker access to the main point. I gave this 3 marks.
    AO4: There was a detailed understanding of linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches represented in the text. However, I felt that there was little to no referencing to wider studies of linguistic issues. Because of this, I can only say you have a clear reference to the wider study of linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches. I gave this 6 marks.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment